AUSWon

Adam Gilchrist

113*off 94 balls
v ZimbabweW.A.C.A2003
Not outAggressive

Adam Gilchrist made 113* off 94 balls against Zimbabwe at W.A.C.A in 2003. Australia won the match.

Was it a ton of consequence?

No: a good ton. His side already led by 502 when the innings began. He made 15% of the team's runs. The match didn't hinge on it: he came in at 5 for 502. How a ToC is decided

Sources: Wikipedia: Zimbabwean cricket team in Australia in 2003–04 · Cricsheet ball-by-ball data

High confidence. We have the full ball-by-ball record: the score when the batter came in, the lead and what the series rode on.

How the score is builtscore · points

Match Impact30% weight+13.244
Clutchness22% weight+10.146
Narrative18% weight+8.849
Conditions & Opposition14% weight+7.654
Historical Weight10% weight+5.151
Perceived Greatness6% weight+2.949
Greatness score on your weighting47.7

Your weighting

  • Match Impact30%Did it decide the course of the game?
  • Clutchness22%The weight of pressure in the moment
  • Narrative18%The story surrounding the innings
  • Conditions & Opposition14%What and who they were up against
  • Historical Weight10%How time and experts have judged it
  • Perceived Greatness6%The consensus of those who watched
Change it on the rankings page

How divisive is it?

Universally great, 1. Almost everyone agrees. This innings transcends the debate. Across five points of view it scores between 48.2 and 48.7.

More from Adam Gilchrist

Rankings