Adam Gilchrist
126off 151 balls
Adam Gilchrist made 126 off 151 balls against New Zealand at Brisbane in 2004. Australia won the match.
Was it a ton of consequence?
No: a good ton. A fast hundred: 83 runs per 100 balls off 151 balls, 100th run off ball 130, batted 7, innings 2. The match was won. How a ToC is decided
Sources: Wikipedia: New Zealand cricket team in Australia in 2004–05 · Cricsheet ball-by-ball data
High confidence. We have the full ball-by-ball record: the score when the batter came in, the lead and what the series rode on.
How the score is builtscore · points
Match Impact30% weight+15.652
Clutchness22% weight+12.155
Narrative18% weight+10.357
Conditions & Opposition14% weight+9.266
Historical Weight10% weight+5.151
Perceived Greatness6% weight+3.559
Greatness score on your weighting55.8
Your weighting
- Match Impact30%Did it decide the course of the game?
- Clutchness22%The weight of pressure in the moment
- Narrative18%The story surrounding the innings
- Conditions & Opposition14%What and who they were up against
- Historical Weight10%How time and experts have judged it
- Perceived Greatness6%The consensus of those who watched
How divisive is it?
Universally great, 3. Almost everyone agrees. This innings transcends the debate. Across five points of view it scores between 55.5 and 57.4.
More from Adam Gilchrist
204* v South Africa
Johannesburg · 2002 · 13th overall83.7149* v Pakistan
Hobart · 1999 · 18th overall82.1144 v Sri Lanka
Kandy · 2004 · 1097th overall63.2162 v New Zealand
Wellington · 2005 · 2114th overall59.4102* v England
W.A.C.A · 2006 · 2208th overall59.2152 v England
Birmingham · 2001 · 2328th overall58.8
Johannesburg · 2002 · 13th overall83.7149* v Pakistan
Hobart · 1999 · 18th overall82.1144 v Sri Lanka
Kandy · 2004 · 1097th overall63.2162 v New Zealand
Wellington · 2005 · 2114th overall59.4102* v England
W.A.C.A · 2006 · 2208th overall59.2152 v England
Birmingham · 2001 · 2328th overall58.8